Water planning is an important risk management concern for road race event organizers. PURPOSE To compare water and cup prediction outputs from a mobile application (app) planning tool against: 1) measured group sweat losses, 2) documented event water and cup usage, and 3) traditional mathematical planning solutions. METHODS Group mean sweating rates (L/h) from 12 published outdoor running studies were each compared to 12 composite averages using the Road Race Water Planner© app (RRWP). Estimated water (gallons) and cup (#) needs were also compared to documented usage at a large marathon event and to traditional mathematical solutions. RESULTS Thirteen group mean sweating rates from 286 runners were compared to composite RRWP estimates. Predicted sweating rate accuracy was 92% for RRWP and ranged from 0 to 69% for traditional mathematical solutions. The 2017 Boston marathon included 27,222 runners on a day averaging 21.5°C. Water and cup usage was 31,740 gallons and 1,036,003 cups, respectively. RRWP estimates were 33,505 gallons and 1,072,160 cups, respectively. The difference in gallons expressed as liters was 0.236 L per person. For a ~4 h marathon, the difference per person as a rate was
from Sports Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2G4nEcS
via IFTTT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.