Reply to “Letter to Editor, in response to Narain et al.”

First, we would like to thank Dr Hacker for the interest in our study regarding conflicts of interest in cervical disc arthroplasty. We would like to point out that their study [1] was determined to be non-conflicted by our analysis. We would reiterate the assertion that the authors did not function as a consultant or accept payment for the conduction of a device study.

from Sports Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2ijkwvJ
via IFTTT