Infant spinal anesthesia: Do girls need a larger dose of local anesthetic?

Summary

Background

Gender differences in absorption, distribution, and metabolism of a number of anesthetic agents have been identified in adults. Clinically, adult studies suggest women demonstrate slower onset of opioid analgesic effects, lower spinal and epidural dose requirements, and greater sensitivity to neuromuscular blocking agents. Sex-related differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of local anesthetics in neonates and infants, however, have not been well documented. As a result, it is not known whether modification of the dose of local anesthetic for awake spinal anesthesia in infants is required.

Aims

Our aim was to determine whether the ED50 and ED95 of local anesthetics used for infant spinal anesthesia are different between sexes.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of data previously collected during dose-response studies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine spinal anesthetics. The doses were reanalyzed using generalized linear regression analysis to determine whether there is a discernible difference in dose requirements between male and female infants.

Results

One hundred and twenty infant spinal anesthetics were reviewed. For levobupivacaine, the ED50 (95% CI) was 0.49 (0.33-0.65) mg vs 0.69 (0.49-0.88), whereas the ED95 (95% CI) was 1.07 (0.73-1.41) vs 0.93 (0.64-1.22) for girls and boys, respectively. For ropivacaine spinal anesthesia, the ED50 (95% CI) was 0.64 (0.35-0.92) mg vs 0.30 (−0.32-0.92), whereas the ED95 (95% CI) was 1.30 (0.73-1.87) vs 1.66 (0.55-2.76) for girls and boys, respectively.

Conclusion

There is no evidence that sex differences occur at the ED50 dose range or at the clinically relevant ED95 dose. Modification of spinal anesthetic dose is not required for infant girls.

from Anaesthesiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2fNccFY
via IFTTT