- Non-operative Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
- Total Knee Replacement (TKR)
Knee OA:
(Harris et al, 2013; n = 134; mean age = 59)
- SEM = 2.65 (OKS)
- SEM = 6.2 (OKS-FCS)
- SEM = 6.9 (OKS-PCS)
TKR:
(Collins et al, 2011; pooled subject data from Dawson et al. 1998, Impellizzeri et al. 2010, Dunbar et al. 2000, Dunbar et al. 2001)
- SEM = 2.2
(Dawson et al, 1998; n = 117; median age = 73)
| 12 item OKS before TKR and at 6-month follow up | |||||
| Standard Deviation | r value | (1-r) | Square Root of (1-r) | SEM | |
| Q1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.63 | 0.37 |
| Q2 | 1.04 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.68 | 0.71 |
| Q3 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.36 | 0.6 | 0.47 |
| Q4 | 0.97 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.67 | 0.65 |
| Q5 | 0.85 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.65 | 0.55 |
| Q6 | 0.9 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 0.66 |
| Q7 | 0.9 | 0.56 | 0.44 | 0.66 | 0.59 |
| Q8 | 1.08 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.72 | 0.78 |
| Q9 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 0.31 | 0.55 | 0.46 |
| Q10 | 1.22 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.72 | 0.88 |
| Q11 | 1.13 | 0.61 | 0.39 | 0.62 | 0.70 |
| Q12 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 0.35 | 0.59 | 0.52 |
| SUM | 10.6 | 6.18 | 5.18 | ||
| AVG | 0.88 | 0.515 | 0.485 | 0.69 | 0.61 |
(Impellizzeri et al, 2010; n = 79; mean age = 69 (7) years; 6 months post TKA)
- SEM = 2.2
Knee OA:
(Harris et al, 2013)
- MDC = ±6 (OKS)
- MDC = ±16 (OKS-PCS)
- MDC = ±15 (OKS-FCS)
TKR:
(Collins et al, 2011)
- MDC = 6.1
(Impellizzeri et al, 2010)
- MDC = 6.1
Knee OA:
(Harris et al, 2013)
- MCID = 6 (OKS)
- MCID = 14 (OKS-PCS)
- MCID = 10 (OKS-FCS)
Knee OA:
(Harris et al, 2013)
- Baseline Mean OKS = 30.29 (10)
- Baseline Mean OKS-PCS = 59.36 (22)
- Baseline Mean OKS-FCS = 67.22 (21)
- 3 Month Follow Up Mean OKS = 32.15 (11)
- 3 Month Follow Up Mean OKS-PCS = 65.13 (24)
- 3 Month Follow Up Mean OKS-FCS = 68.66 (23)
TKA:
(Dawson et al, 1998)
- Pre-operative Mean = 44.61
- 6 Month Follow Up Mean = 29.33
(Jenny et al, 2012; n = 200; mean age = 71 (9))
- Mean OKS = 43.7 (before surgery)
- Mean OKS = 20.5 (after surgery)
(Madsen et al, 2013; n = 80)
| OKS in patients in group-based rehab vs. supervised home training s/p TKA | |||
| Intervention | Control | p-value | |
| 3 months | 7.9 ± 5.9 | 8.4 ± 6.7 | 0.7 |
| 6 months | 10.5 ± 7.5 | 9.7 ± 8.5 | 0.7 |
Knee OA:
(Harris et al, 2013)
- Excellent Test-Retest Reliability
- ICC = 0.93 (OKS)
- ICC = 0.91 (OKS-PCS)
- ICC = 0.92 (OKS-FCS)
TKA:
(Collins et al. 2011)
- Excellent Test-Retest Reliability
- ICC = 0.91-0.94
- Coefficient of Reliability = 6.45 (Bland and Altman method)
(Dawson et al, 1998)
- Excellent Test-Retest Reliability
- r = 0.92
(Impellizzeri et al, 2010)
- Excellent Test-Retest Reliability
- ICC = 0.91
Knee OA:
(Harris et al, 2013)
- Excellent Internal Consistency
- Cronbach's α = 0.94 (OKS)
- Cronbach's α = 0.88 (OKS-FCS)
- Cronbach's α = 0.90 (OKS-PCS)
(Xie et al, 2011; n = 187; mean age = 64)
- Excellent Internal Consistency
- Cronbach's α = .896
TKA Patients:
(Collins et al, 2011)
- Excellent Internal Consistency
- Cronbach's α = 0.87-0.93
(Dawson et al, 1998)
- Excellent Internal Consistency
- Cronbach's α = 0.87 (pre-op)
- Cronbach's α = 0.93 (6-months post-op)
(Dunbar et al, 2001; n = 1,200; mean age = 78)
- Excellent Internal Consistency
- Cronbach's α = 0.93
(Jenny et al, 2013: n = 100; mean age = 72)
- Excellent Internal Consistency
- Cronbach's α = 0.91
(Jenny et al, 2012)
- Satisfactory Internal Consistency
- Cronbach's α = .88 (pre-op)
- Cronbach's α = .66 (post-op)
TKA:
(Jenny et al, 2012)
Concurrent Validity compared to AKS
- Strong negative correlation pre operatively between OKS and both the AKS knee and function scores (r = -.33; r = -.47)
- Weak negative correlation post operatively between OKS and AKS knee score (r = -.19)
- Strong negative correlation post operatively between OKS and AKS function score (r = -.49)
Knee OA:
(Harris et al, 2013)
| Baseline Spearman's correlations between scores | |||
| OKS | OKS-PCS | OKS-FCS | |
| ICOAP | -0.88 | -0.88 | -0.79 |
| KOOS-PS | -0.85 | -0.78 | -0.87 |
| PCS-12 | 0.65 | ||
| MCS-12 | 0.37 | ||
| All correlations were significant at the 0.01 level | |||
| 3-month Spearman's correlations between scores | |||
| OKS | OKS-PCS | OKS-FCS | |
| ICOAP | -0.67 | -0.67 | -0.60 |
| KOOS-PS | -0.62 | -0.55 | -0.62 |
| All correlations were significant at the 0.01 level ICOAP = Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain KOOS-PS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score - Physical Function Short Form PCS-12 = Physical Component Summary of SF-12 MCS-12 = Mental Component Summary of SF-12 | |||
(Xie et al, 2011)
- Convergent Validity
- OKS strongly correlated with SF 6D (role limitation, social function and pain) and with EQ- SD (mobility, self care, usual activities and pain/discomfort) and Mobility-VAS (p =.51 -.82)
- OKS moderately correlated with SF-6D physical functioning (p =.44)
- OKS weakly correlated with SF-6D vitality (p = .35)
- Divergent Validity
- OKS strongly correlated with SF-6D mental health (p =.51)
- OKS moderately correlated with EQ-5D anxiety/depression (p = .41)
TKA:
(Collins et al, 2011)
- Good correlation with knee-specific and general health questionnaires, such as the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, American Knee Society Score, Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale, and pain and physical function components of the Short Form 36 and Health Assessment Questionnaire. See Dawson et al. and Impellizzeri et al.
(Dawson et al, 1998)
- Moderate correlation with AKS
- Significant agreement with parts of the SF36 and HAQ (physical function and pain)
| Correlation between the 12-item knee score and the AKS score, SF36 and HAQ assessments in 117 patients before operation and in 85 at the six-month follow-up | ||
| Correlation Coefficient | ||
| Test | Preop | Postop |
| AKS assessment | ||
| Knee Score | -0.47** | -- |
| Function | -0.54** | -- |
| SF36 | ||
| Physical | -0.69** | -0.66** |
| Pain | -0.71** | -0.78** |
| Role-physical | -0.52** | -0.43** |
| Role-mental | -0.25** | -0.46** |
| Social function | -0.56** | -0.78** |
| Mental health | -0.19* | -0.41** |
| Energy | -0.35** | -0.62** |
| Health perceptions | -0.07 | -0.41** |
| HAQ | ||
| Pain VAS | 0.53** | -- |
| Disability index | 0.61** | -- |
| *p<0.05, **p<0.01 | ||
(Dunbar et al, 2000)
- The Oxford-12 correlated most closely with the physical domains.
- The Oxford-12 correlated poorly with the eating domain of the SIP (rho = 0.14) thus demonstrating good divergent construct validity.
(Impellizzeri et al, 2010)
| Average Correlations between Instruments | |
| Oxford Knee Score | |
| WOMAC Pain | 0.67* |
| WOMAC Stiffness | 0.45* |
| WOMAC Function | 0.67* |
| KOS-ADLS Symptoms | -0.48* |
| KOS-ADLS Function | -0.62* |
| KOS-ADLS Total Score | -0.62* |
| SF-12 PC | -0.50* |
| SF-12 MC | -0.17 |
| *P<.001 | |
- The OKS was highly correlated with KOS-ADLS function and WOMAC pain and function subscales but less well correlated with those of the WOMAC stiffness and KOS-ADLS symptom scales.
(Jenny et al, 2013)
- Poor Correlation - OKS with AKSS: 0.20 (P<.001)
- Poor Correlation - OKS with HAAS: 0.19 (P<.001)
Knee OA:
(Xie et al, 2011)
- All items were shown to be relevant.
TKA:
(Collins et al, 2011)
- Extensive input from patients in the development of the OKS ensures content validity.
(Dawson et al, 1998)
- Items were selected based on interviews with patients considering a TKR to identify how they identified and reported problems with their knees. A questionnaire was drafted and tested on a different set of patients, requesting additional comments related to their knee problems that were not addressed. Modifications were made and this procedure was repeated 2 additional times to produce the final questionnaire.
TKA:
(Dunbar et al, 2000)
- Floor effect in 6.8% of patients
- Ceiling effect in 0.1% of patients
(Impellizzeri et al, 2010)
- No floor or ceiling effects prior to TKA
- No floor effects 6 months postoperatively
- Ceiling effects 6 months postoperatively in 27% of patients
(Jenny et al, 2012)
- Pre-Op Group: no floor effect, small ceiling effect (7%)
- Post-Op Group: substantial floor effect (33%), no ceiling effect
- Calculated using original scoring scale
(Jenny et al, 2013)
- Ceiling effect = 33%
Knee OA:
(Harris et al, 2013)
- Small change from baseline to 3 month follow-up
- OKS: ES = 0.19
- OKS-PCS: ES = 0.26
- OKS-FCS: ES = 0.07
TKA:
(Collins et al, 2011)
- ES = 0.9 – 2.19
- SRM = 0.7
(Dawson et al, 1998)
- Large responsiveness from pre-operative to the 6 month follow-up (ES = 2.19)
(Impellizzeri et al, 2010)
- Large Responsiveness
- Effect Size = 0.9
- SRM = 0.7
(Lin et al, 2013)
- Excellent Responsiveness
- Most responsive compared to EQ-VAS and EQ-5D
- SRM: 1.50 (large magnitude of effect)
Knee OA:
(Harris et al, 2013)
- The OKS could be used in clinical practice to monitor disease progression in individual patients undergoing non-operative management for knee OA.
TKA:
(Collins et al, 2011)
- Clinicians should be aware that some patients may require explanation of individual items, which could introduce interviewer bias.
(Dawson et al, 1998)
- This tool is intended specifically with knee surgery alone.
Collins, Natalie J, Misra, Devyani, Felson, David T, Crossley, Kay M, & Roos, Ewa M. (2011). Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS‐PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS‐ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis care & research, 63(S11), S208-S228.
Dawson, Jill, Fitzpatrick, Ray, Murray, David, & Carr, Andrew. (1998). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume, 80(1), 63-69.
Dunbar, Michael J, Robertsson, Otto, Ryd, Leif, & Lidgren, Lars. (2000). Translation and validation of the Oxford-12 item knee score for use in Sweden. Acta Orthopaedica, 71(3), 268-274.
Dunbar, MJ, Robertsson, Otto, Ryd, Leif, & Lidgren, Lars. (2001). Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF 3600 PATIENTS FROM THE SWEDISH KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REGISTRY. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume, 83(3), 339-344x.
Harris, Kristina K, Dawson, Jill, Jones, Luke D, Beard, David J, & Price, Andrew J. (2013). Extending the use of PROMs in the NHS—using the Oxford Knee Score in patients undergoing non-operative management for knee osteoarthritis: a validation study. BMJ open, 3(8), e003365.
Impellizzeri, Franco M, Mannion, Anne F, Leunig, Michael, Bizzini, Mario, & Naal, Florian D. (2011). Comparison of the reliability, responsiveness, and construct validity of 4 different questionnaires for evaluating outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 26(6), 861-869.
Jenny, J-Y, & Diesinger, Y. (2012). The Oxford Knee Score: compared performance before and after knee replacement. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 98(4), 409-412.
Jenny, Jean-Yves, Louis, Pascal, & Diesinger, Yann. (2013). High Activity Arthroplasty Score has a Lower Ceiling Effect Than Standard Scores After Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty.
Lin, Fang-Ju, Samp, Jennifer, Munoz, Alexis, Wong, Pei Shieen, & Pickard, A Simon. (2013). Evaluating change using patient-reported outcome measures in knee replacement: the complementary nature of the EQ-5D index and VAS scores. The European Journal of Health Economics, 1-8.
Madsen, Majbritt, Larsen, Kristian, Madsen, Inger Kirkegård, Søe, Hanne, & Hansen, Torben Bæk. (2013). Late group-based rehabilitation has no advantages compared with supervised home-exercises after total knee arthroplasty. Danish medical journal, 60(4), A4607-A4607.
Roland, Martin, & Morris, Richard. (1983). A study of the natural history of back pain: part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. spine, 8(2), 141-144.
Xie, Feng, Ye, Hua, Zhang, Yu, Liu, Xia, Lei, Ting, & LI, Shu‐Chuen. (2011). Extension from inpatients to outpatients: validity and reliability of the Oxford Knee Score in measuring health outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis. International journal of rheumatic diseases, 14(2), 206-210.
from Rehabilitation via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2jBHhJs
via IFTTT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.