The paradox in the current use of videolaryngoscopes in the UK

Editor—The recent national survey by Cook and Kelly¹ is the first to provide a comprehensive overview of the current usage and practices of videolaryngoscopes (VLs) in UK clinical practice. We feel we can add to this area and would like to present some of the results of a regional survey on VLs that we conducted to gain an understanding of current practices and decision-making in the use of VLs in general airway management in the operating theatre (OT). The survey was conducted electronically via SurveyMonkey (San Mateo, CA, USA) and was distributed to 10 departments of anaesthesia in the London Deanery (London, UK) in December 2016. There were 171 responses collected between December 2016 and January 2017 with a response rate of about 51%, including 44% consultants, 21% specialty Registrar (StR) yr 7–yr 5, 14% StR yr 4–yr 3, and 7% core trainees. Selected findings from the survey were as follows:

• When asked whether VLs should be first line management strategy for anticipated difficult intubation (where bag mask ventilation was not predicted difficult), when given the choice between a VL and a Macintosh laryngoscope short/long blade +/–bougie, 51% of those surveyed preferred to use a VL.
• When asked whether VLs should be used routinely for intubation in all patients, regardless of predicted difficulty of intubation, 14% of respondents thought that VLs should be used routinely.
• When asked how many uses it approximately required to gain subjective competence in the use of any VL, 68% of respondents felt it required over 10 uses, 32% felt it required over 20 uses and 13% felt it required over 30 uses.
• When asked whether anaesthetists should begin their core training with VLs alongside the Macintosh laryngoscope as first line for all intubations, 10% of respondents were of the opinion that this should be the case.

from Anaesthesiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2wo9pGB
via IFTTT