Abstract
Background:
Due to the decreasing prevalence of IDH1 mutations in older patients, the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of brain tumors proposed not to perform sequencing for IDH in glioblastoma patients ≥55 years. We present a cost-effectiveness analysis to estimate the financial impact of these guidelines.
Methods:
From 2010 to 2015 we performed 1023 IDH tests in gliomas, amounting to ~1.09 million dollars in direct laboratory test costs. Samples were tested using R132H-specific immunohistochemistry, DNA sequencing validated for detection of non-canonical IDH1/2 mutations, or both methods.
Results:
In cases tested by DNA sequencing, the fraction of non-R132H mutations was 5.4%, which included only two high-grade gliomas in patients ≥55 years (0.9%). When re-modeling the optimal age cut-off in our patient population using 5-year age-binning, we found a 10-times higher pre-test probability for the presence of a non-canonical IDH1 mutation in the setting of a negative IDH1-R132H-immunohistochemistry result in patients <55 years. Applying the independently confirmed age cut-off of 55 years to glioblastoma patients (64%) would result in $403,200 saved (43%). By not performing sequencing in patients ≥55 years, the turn-around time to final integrated neuropathological diagnosis is reduced by 53%, allowing these patients to gain earlier benefits from personalized genomic medicine.
Conclusion:
The negligible prevalence of non-canonical IDH mutations in glioblastoma patients ≥55 years argues against universal IDH-sequencing in this population. We predict that adoption of this age-based sequencing cut-off recommendation from the 2016 WHO guidelines will result in significant cost and time savings throughout the global healthcare system.from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2tlg4Tx
via IFTTT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.