Transient Tachypnea of Newborns Is Associated With Maternal Spinal Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: The risk for transient tachypnea of newborns, a common cause of respiratory distress in the neonatal period, is 2- to 6-fold higher during elective cesarean delivery compared to vaginal delivery. Here, we evaluated the association between transient tachypnea of newborns and the degree and duration of predelivery maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. METHODS: Demographic data, details of anesthetic management, blood pressure measurements, and vasopressor requirement preceding delivery were compared between transient tachypnea newborns (n = 30) and healthy neonates (n = 151) with normal respiratory function born via elective cesarean delivery between July 2015 and February 2016. The degree and duration of hypotension were assessed using area under the curve for systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤90 mm Hg and area under the curve for mean arterial pressure ≤65 mm Hg. After adjusting for confounders, multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between area under the curve for SBP and transient tachypnea of newborns. RESULTS: The median area under the curve for SBP was higher in cases of transient tachypnea of newborns (0.94; interquartile range, 0–28.7 mm Hg*min) compared to healthy controls (0; interquartile range, 0–3.30 mm Hg*min; P = .001). Similarly, median area under the curve for mean arterial pressure was also higher in cases of transient tachypnea of newborns (0; interquartile range, 0–18.6 mm Hg*min) compared to controls (0; interquartile range, 0–1.1 mm Hg*min; P = .01). Mothers of transient tachypnea newborns received significantly higher amounts of phenylephrine and ephedrine compared to controls (P = .001 and 0.01, respectively). Hence, the total vasopressor dose given to mothers in the transient tachypnea of newborn group was much higher than for the control group (P = .001). In the multivariable logistic regression, area under the curve for SBP was significantly associated with transient tachypnea of newborns (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04, P = .005) after adjusting for gravidity and the type of anesthetic (spinal versus combined spinal epidural). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the degree and duration of maternal SBP

from Anaesthesiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2GrRU0Y
via IFTTT

Consensus Statement of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States on Unresolved Clinical Questions Concerning the Management of Patients With Malignant Hyperthermia

At a recent consensus conference, the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States addressed 6 important and unresolved clinical questions concerning the optimal management of patients with malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility or acute MH. They include: (1) How much dantrolene should be available in facilities where volatile agents are not available or administered, and succinylcholine is only stocked on site for emergency purposes? (2) What defines masseter muscle rigidity? What is its relationship to MH, and how should it be managed when it occurs? (3) What is the relationship between MH susceptibility and heat- or exercise-related rhabdomyolysis? (4) What evidence-based interventions should be recommended to alleviate hyperthermia associated with MH? (5) After treatment of acute MH, how much dantrolene should be administered and for how long? What criteria should be used to determine stopping treatment with dantrolene? (6) Can patients with a suspected personal or family history of MH be safely anesthetized before diagnostic testing? This report describes the consensus process and the outcomes for each of the foregoing unanswered clinical questions. Accepted for publication December 2, 2018. Funding: Travel, hotel, and some food expenses for the attendees at the consensus meeting were paid by the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Reprints will not be available from the authors. Address correspondence to Ronald S. Litman, DO, ML, Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Address e-mail to litmanr@email.chop.edu. © 2019 International Anesthesia Research Society

from Anaesthesiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2Ii8YIm
via IFTTT

In Response

No abstract available

from Anaesthesiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2GsTGi3
via IFTTT

Perioperative Epidural Use and Risk of Delirium in Surgical Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the PODCAST Trial

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium is an important public health concern without effective prevention strategies. This study tested the hypothesis that perioperative epidural use would be associated with decreased risk of delirium through postoperative day 3. METHODS: This was a secondary, observational, nonrandomized analysis of data from The Prevention of Delirium and Complications Associated With Surgical Treatments Trial (PODCAST; NCT01690988). The primary outcome of the current study was the incidence of delirium (ie, any positive delirium screen, postanesthesia care unit through postoperative day 3) in surgical patients (gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary-pancreatic, gynecologic, and urologic) receiving postoperative epidural analgesia compared to those without an epidural. As a secondary outcome, all delirium assessments were then longitudinally analyzed in relation to epidural use throughout the follow-up period. Given the potential relevance to delirium, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression were also analyzed as secondary outcomes. A semiparsimonious multivariable logistic regression model was used to test the association between postoperative epidural use and delirium incidence, and generalized estimating equations were used to test associations with secondary outcomes described. Models included relevant covariates to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: In total, 263 patients were included for analysis. Epidural use was not independently associated with reduced delirium incidence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.32–1.35]; P= .247). However, when analyzing all assessments over the follow-up period, epidural patients were 64% less likely to experience an episode of delirium (adjusted odds ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.17–0.78]; P= .009). Adjusted pain scores (visual analog scale, 0–100 mm) were significantly lower in the epidural group on postoperative day 1 (morning, −16 [95% CI, −26 to −7], P

from Anaesthesiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2IdBE56
via IFTTT

Proposal for a Revised Classification of the Depth of Neuromuscular Block and Suggestions for Further Development in Neuromuscular Monitoring

No abstract available

from Anaesthesiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2GqnE6p
via IFTTT

Gender Inequality in Anesthesiology Research: An Overview of 2018

No abstract available

from Anaesthesiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2Ig8HWe
via IFTTT

Clot Retraction: Lost in Interpretation?

No abstract available

from Anaesthesiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2GsFu8K
via IFTTT