Τετάρτη 31 Ιανουαρίου 2018
Strength Training Effects on Muscular Regeneration after ACL Reconstruction
from Sports Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2E2ub5I
via IFTTT
Effects of Acute Salbutamol Intake on Peripheral and Central Fatigue in Trained Men
from Sports Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2FBvNke
via IFTTT
Ablation of the carotid bodies in disease: meeting its adverse effects
Abstract
Its now 26 years since the publication of a seminal study that showed that carotid body (CB) chemoreceptors are involved in the progression of chronic intermittent hypoxia-induced hypertension.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
from Physiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2rX2Z3A
via IFTTT
Phrenic motor neuron adenosine 2A receptors elicit phrenic motor facilitation
Abstract
Cervical spinal adenosine 2A (A2A) receptor activation elicits a prolonged increase in phrenic nerve activity, an effect known as phrenic motor facilitation (pMF). The specific cervical spinal cells expressing the relevant A2A receptors for pMF are unknown. This is an important question since the physiological outcome of A2A receptor activation is highly cell-type specific. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that the relevant A2A receptors for pMF are expressed in phrenic motor neurons per se versus non-phrenic neurons of the cervical spinal cord. A2A receptor immunostaining significantly colocalizes with NeuN-positive neurons (89 ± 2%). Intrapleural siRNA injections were used to selectively knock down A2A receptors in cholera toxin B-subunit-labelled phrenic motor neurons. A2A receptor knock down was verified by a ∼45% decrease in A2A receptor immunoreactivity within phrenic motor neurons versus non-targeting siRNAs (siNT; P < 0.05). There was no evidence for knock-down in cervical non-phrenic motor neurons. In anaesthetized, paralyzed and ventilated rats, pMF induced by cervical (C3-4) intrathecal injections of the A2A receptor agonist CGS21680 was greatly attenuated in siA2A (21%) versus siNT treated rats (147%; P < 0.01). There were no significant effects of siA2A on phrenic burst frequency. Collectively, our results support the hypothesis that phrenic motor neurons express the A2A receptors relevant to A2A receptor-induced pMF.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
from Physiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2nuE2XK
via IFTTT
Immediate and delayed loading of fixed dental prostheses supported by single or two splinted implants. A histomorphometric study in dogs
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate presumptive differences in osseointegration at implants supporting crowns that are physiologically loaded either immediately or 3 months after installation.
Material and methods
All premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six dogs. After 3 months of healing, three implants were installed in the premolar region and two in the molar region in one side of the mandible. Likewise, after another 3 months, five implants were installed in the contralateral side, and impressions were taken bilaterally. Within 48 hours, two single crowns were screwed bilaterally onto two implants in the premolar region, and two splinted crowns reproducing the shape of the first molar were screwed bilaterally onto the implants in the molar region. The mesial implants were used as no-loaded controls. Sacrifices were performed after 3 months and histological analyses were performed.
Results
At the premolar sites, mineralized bone-to-implant contact (MBIC%) was 78.0±4.0% and 70.9±7.9% at the delayed and immediately loaded sites, respectively. This difference was statistically significant. At the control implants, MBIC% was 61.4±14.7% and 63.1±13.1% at the delayed and the immediately loaded sites, respectively. At the molar sites, MBIC% was 79.2 ±10.9% and 61.1±10.3% at the delayed and immediately loaded sites, respectively.
Conclusions
Applying a delayed loading to fixed dental prostheses supported by single- or two-splinted implants yielded higher proportions of bone-to-implant contact (osseointegration) compared to immediately loaded implants. Moreover, both types of loading protocols yielded a higher rate of osseointegration compared to unloaded implant sites after 3 months following implant installation.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
from Rehabilitation via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2E3UVmo
via IFTTT