Τρίτη 5 Δεκεμβρίου 2017

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis of semiprone versus prone position

Abstract

Background

The preferred surgical approach for esophageal cancer is a minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy with a two-field lymph node dissection. The thoracoscopic phase may be performed either in prone- or in left lateral decubitus (LLD) position. Prone positioning has been associated with better pulmonary outcomes compared to LLD positioning; however, conversion to a classic thoracotomy is more difficult. The semiprone position has been proposed as an alternative approach.

Methods

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database (2008–2014) was performed to compare postoperative complications, surgical radicality, and lymph node yield between patients who underwent three-stage minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy in either the prone or semiprone position. Comparative analyses were conducted before and after propensity score matching.

Results

One hundred and twenty-one patients were included. In total, 82 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in semiprone position and 39 patients in prone position. After propensity score matching, both groups consisted of 39 patients. The operative time in the semiprone group was longer (368 vs. 225 min, P < 0.001) and in this group the lymph node yield was significantly higher (16 (range 6–80) vs. 13 (range 3–33), P = 0.019). There were no statistically significant differences regarding radical resections, postoperative complications, and hospital stay.

Conclusion

The use of semiprone positioning in MIE is safe, feasible, and at least comparable to MIE in prone position in terms of oncological clearance and postoperative complications.



from Endoscopy via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2nucvcl
via IFTTT

App warns users when drugs are laced with fentanyl

Bad Batch Alert is an anonymous texting service that uses data to track fentanyl overdose hotspots and points users in the direction of harm reduction services

from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2irfTzn
via IFTTT

Copy number variation arising from gene conversion on the human Y chromosome

Abstract

We describe the variation in copy number of a ~ 10 kb region overlapping the long intergenic noncoding RNA (lincRNA) gene, TTTY22, within the IR3 inverted repeat on the short arm of the human Y chromosome, leading to individuals with 0–3 copies of this region in the general population. Variation of this CNV is common, with 266 individuals having 0 copies, 943 (including the reference sequence) having 1, 23 having 2 copies, and two having 3 copies, and was validated by breakpoint PCR, fibre-FISH, and 10× Genomics Chromium linked-read sequencing in subsets of 1234 individuals from the 1000 Genomes Project. Mapping the changes in copy number to the phylogeny of these Y chromosomes previously established by the Project identified at least 20 mutational events, and investigation of flanking paralogous sequence variants showed that the mutations involved flanking sequences in 18 of these, and could extend over > 30 kb of DNA. While either gene conversion or double crossover between misaligned sister chromatids could formally explain the 0–2 copy events, gene conversion is the more likely mechanism, and these events include the longest non-allelic gene conversion reported thus far. Chromosomes with three copies of this CNV have arisen just once in our data set via another mechanism: duplication of 420 kb that places the third copy 230 kb proximal to the existing proximal copy. Our results establish gene conversion as a previously under-appreciated mechanism of generating copy number changes in humans and reveal the exceptionally large size of the conversion events that can occur.



from Genetics via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2nrTI0Y
via IFTTT

Rebuttal from Y. C. Tzeng and R. B. Panerai



from Physiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AttYGo
via IFTTT

CrossTalk opposing view: dynamic cerebral autoregulation should be quantified using induced (rather than spontaneous) blood pressure fluctuations



from Physiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AxGhQ9
via IFTTT

CrossTalk proposal: dynamic cerebral autoregulation should be quantified using spontaneous blood pressure fluctuations



from Physiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AsfmXX
via IFTTT

Rebuttal from David Simpson and Jurgen Claassen



from Physiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AxJcbp
via IFTTT