Τρίτη 16 Φεβρουαρίου 2016

Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test

Link to instrument: http://ift.tt/1VjQMtv
Acronym:
CKCUEST
Purpose:
The Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test is a low cost performance test that provides quantitative data (score) for an upper extremity task in closed kinetic chain with no need for high technology to be realized in sportive or clinical settings. It can help to determine deficits in closed kinetic chain upper extremity functional performance.
Description:
  • Patients assume the push-up position, with hands set 36 inches apart, and are scored based on the number of times the patient is able to pick one hand up and swing it across their hand stance and touch the supporting hand in a 15 second period.
  • Females can perform the test in a modified (kneeling) push up position.
Area of Assessment: Upper Extremity Function
Body Part: Upper Extremity
ICF Domain: Body Function
Domain: Motor
Assessment Type: Performance Measure
Length of Test: 05 Minutes or Less
Time to Administer:
Approximately 4 Minutes
Number of Items: 1
Equipment Required:
Tape; Stopwatch
Training Required:
No formal training required.
Type of training required: No Training
Cost: Free
Actual Cost:
No cost
Age Range: Adult: 18-64 years
Administration Mode: Paper/Pencil
Diagnosis: Movement disorders
Populations Tested:
  • Male College Students (Goldbeck & Davies, 2000)
  • Athletes (Hegedus, 2014)
  • Collegiate Male Baseball Players (Roush, 2007)
  • College-aged Men & Women (Schulte-Edelmann, 2005)
  • Men & Women Across Activity Levels (Tucci, 2014)
Standard Error of Measurement (SEM):

Active Females (Tucci, 2014; n=20; mean age= 21.75 (1.37) years)

  • Number of touches: SEM= 2.76
  • Power: SEM= 12.94
  • Normalized Score: SEM= 0.04

Active Males (Tucci, 2014; n=20; mean age= 23.15 (2.48) years):

  • Number of touches: SEM= 2.0
  • Power: SEM= 20.03
  • Normalized score: SEM= 0.03

Females with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (Tucci (2014; n=15; mean age 49.87 (5.87) years):

  • Number of touches: SEM=1.89
  • Power: SEM= 6.02
  • Normalized Score: SEM= 0.03

Male with Subacromial impingement syndrome (Tucci, 2014; n=13; mean age= 45.15 (12.59) years):

  • Number of touches: SEM=1.95
  • Power: SEM= 7.50
  • Normalized score: SEM= 0.03

Male College Students (Goldbeck & Davies, 2000; n= 24; mean age 20.3 years)

  • Number of touches: SEM= 0.49 (calculated from SD listed on p. 41)

Sedentary Female (Tucci, 2014; n=20; mean age= 22.65 (3.00) years)

  • Number of touches: SEM= 2.43
  • Power: SEM= 12.94
  • Normalized score: SEM= 0.04

Sedentary Male (Tucci, 2014; n=20; mean age=24.95 (2.45) years)

  • Number of touches: SEM= 1.45
  • Power: SEM= 12.45
  • Normalized score: SEM= 0.02
Minimal Detectable Change (MDC):

Active Females (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: MDC= 3.91
  • Power: MDC= 18.30
  • Normalized Score: MDC= 0.06

Active Males (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: MDC= 2.82
  • Power: MDC= 28.32
  • Normalized score: MDC= 0.04

Female with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: MDC= 2.67
  • Power: MDC= 8.52
  • Normalized Score: MDC= 0.04

Males with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: MDC= 2.76
  • Power: MDC= 10.61
  • Normalized score: MDC= 0.04

Males College Students (Goldbeck &Davies, 2000)

  • Number of touches: MDC= 1.35 (calculated from SD on p. 41)

Sedentary Females (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: MDC= 3.43
  • Power: MDC= 18.30
  • Normalized score: MDC= 0.05

Sedentary Males (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: MDC= 2.05
  • Power: MDC= 17.79
  • Normalized score: MDC= 0.03
Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID):
Not Established
Cut-Off Scores:
Athletes (Hegedus, 2014)
  • In a small, single-center trial, a cut score of <=24 discriminated between non-injured and injured collegiate baseball players with upper extremity sport-related injury. However, this cut score has poor diagnostic utility (sensitivity=0.72, specificity=0.69, positive likelihood ratio=2.3, negative likelihood ratio=0.39).
Normative Data:

College-aged Males (Hegedus, 2014)

  • Number of touches: 27.8 ± 1.8

Collegiate Male Baseball Players (Roush (2007; n=77, mean age 19.03 (1.22) years)

  • Number of touches: 30.41 ± 3.87

Female Reference Values (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: 20.5
  • Power: 135
  • Normalized score: 0.31

Male Reference Values (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: 18.5
  • Power: 150
  • Normalized score: 0.26
Test-retest Reliability:

Active Female (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.85)
  • Power: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.82)
  • Normalized Score: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.87)

Active Male (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.89)
  • Power: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.84)
  • Normalized score: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.90)

Female with subacromial impingement syndrome (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.93)
  • Power: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.94)
  •  Normalized Score: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.94)

Male with subacromial impingement syndrome (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.91)
  • Power: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.93)
  • Normalized score: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.92)

Male College Students (Goldbeck &Davies, 2000)

  • Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.922)

Sedentary Female (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.92)
  • Power: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.96)
  • Normalized score: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.92)

Sedentary Male (Tucci, 2014)

  • Number of touches: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.96)
  • Power: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.96)
  • Normalized score: Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.96)
Interrater/Intrarater Reliability:
Not Established
Internal Consistency:
Not Established
Criterion Validity (Predictive/Concurrent):
Not Established
Construct Validity (Convergent/Discriminant):

Not Established

Content Validity:
Not Established
Face Validity:
Not Established
Floor/Ceiling Effects:
Not Established
Responsiveness:

College-aged Men and Women (Schulte-Edelmann et al., 2005; n=30)

  • Moderate Responsiveness (ES= 0.58463, calculated from Table 4 on p. 132)
Considerations:
  • Goldbeck & Davies, 2000
    • Contraindications to perform the test include elderly age and patients with wrist/ elbow pathologies or posterior instabilities of the shoulder.
  • Hegedus, 2014
    • Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness are not established. Caution should be exercised in the clinical interpretation of CKCUEST in relationship to risk assessment or as a stand-alone diagnostic tool for upper extremity sports-related injury.
  • Roush, 2007
    • Patients with comorbidities of the upper extremities may have difficulty performing the task. The older geriatric population may be unable to perform the test, and patients who are at risk of fracture may have an increased risk due to the force of impact.
  • Tucci, 2014
    • Some healthy subjects reported pain after the test even with no pain reported before the test, thus clinicians should have care when the test is considered in the initial evaluation of a subject with shoulder injury.
Bibliography:

Goldbeck TG, Davies GJ. (2000). Test-retest reliability of the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test: a clinical field test. J Sport Rehabil. 9:35-45.

Hegedus EJ, Vidt, ME & Tarara, DT. (2014). The best combination of physical performance and self-report measures to capture function in three patient groups. Physical Therapy Reviews. 19(3), 196-203.

Roush, J. R., Kitamura, J., & Waits, M. C. (2007). Reference Values for the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) for Collegiate Baseball Players. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy : NAJSPT. 2(3), 159–163.

 

Schulte-Edelman, J, Davies, GJ, Kernozek, TW, & Gerberding, ED. (2005). The Effects of Plyometric Training of the Posterior Shoulder and Elbow. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 19(1), 129-134.

Tucci, HT, Martins, J, Carvalho Sposito, G, Camarini, PM, Siriani de Oliveria, A. (2014). Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability test (CKCUES test): a reliability study in persons with and without shoulder impingement syndrome. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 15(1), 1-9.
Year published: 2000
Instrument in PDF Format: Yes


from Rehabilitation via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/247ASIE
via IFTTT

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου

Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.