Which Cut-offs for Secondary V[Combining Dot Above]O2max Criteria Are Robust to Diurnal Variations?

Purpose The aim was to determine the minimum secondary exhaustion criteria cut-offs (i.e. max respiratory exchange ratio [RERmax], max heart rate [HRmax], max rating of perceived exertion [RPEmax], and max blood lactate concentration [BLmax]) necessary to determine maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) during cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET), by balancing type I and type II errors. A further aim was to investigate if the defined cut-offs would be robust to diurnal and to day-to-day variations. Methods Data from two CPET studies involving young athletes were analyzed. In the first study, 70 male participants performed one CPET until exhaustion to define cut-offs. In the second study, eight males and five females performed one CPET on seven consecutive days at six different times of day (i.e., diurnal variation). The time of the CPET was identical on the sixth and seventh days (i.e., day-to-day variation). To ensure comparability both studies were carried out under the same conditions. Results Participants' mean VO2max was 63.0 ± 5.3 ml/kg/min. RERmax ≥ 1.10 was reached by 100%, HRmax ≥ 95% of age predicted maximum heart rate by 99%, RPEmax ≥ 19 by 100%, and BLmax ≥ 8 mmol/l by 100% of participants, respectively. Regarding the intra-day variations, latter cut-offs were not reached in two cases for RERmax and in one case for HRmax and BLmax. Intraclass correlations for the day-to-day variability were r = 0.823 for RERmax, r = 0.828 for HRmax, and r = 0.380 for BLmax, respectively. Conclusions High cut-off values for secondary exhaustion criteria need to be used to determine VO2max in athletes. Address for Correspondence: Dr. Raphael Knaier, Departement für Sport, Bewegung und Gesundheit, Universität Basel, Birsstrasse 320B, 4052 Basel, Switzerland; E-Mail: raphael.knaier@unibas.ch, Phone: +41-612074710, Fax: +41-612074742. This study was not funded. None of the authors involved in the present study have any conflict of interest, financial, personal, or otherwise, that would influence this research, and the results do not constitute endorsement by the American College of Sports Medicine. The authors declare that the results of the study are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation. Accepted for publication: 10 December 2018. © 2018 American College of Sports Medicine

from Sports Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2QTQWzc
via IFTTT