Reply to “Clinical Practice Guidelines or Clinical Research Guidelines?”

We thank our esteemed clinical colleagues Bagić et al. (2018) for their interest in our paper "IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)" (Hari et al. 2018). We hereby respectfully respond to the criticism that our paper has (1) a confusing title and (2) poorly-weighted contents.

from Physiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2NoWA7W
via IFTTT