BACKGROUND: Continuous and intermittent noninvasive measurements of arterial blood pressure (BP) have not been compared in the same population. In a large panel of intensive care unit patients, we assessed the agreement between CNAP(TM) (Continuous Noninvasive Arterial Pressure) finger cuff beat-to-beat monitoring of BP and reference intraarterial measurements. Two automated oscillometric brachial cuff devices were also tested: CNAP brachial cuff (used for CNAP finger cuff calibration) and an alternative device. The performance for detecting hypotension (intraarterial mean BP 10%), and hypertension (intraarterial systolic BP >140 mm Hg) was evaluated. We also assessed the between-calibration drift of CNAP finger cuff BP in specific situations: cardiovascular intervention or no intervention. METHODS: With each device, 3 pairs of noninvasive and intraarterial measurements were prospectively collected and analyzed according to current guidelines, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard. The trending ability and drift of the CNAP finger cuff BP were assessed over a 15-minute observation period. RESULTS: In 182 patients, CNAP finger cuff and CNAP brachial cuff readings did not conform to ISO standard requirements (mean bias +/- SD exceeding the maximum tolerated 5 +/- 8 mm Hg), whereas the alternative automated brachial cuff succeeded for mean and diastolic BP. CNAP finger cuff trending ability was poor (concordance rate =0.91, positive and negative likelihood ratios >=5 and
from Anaesthesiology via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1YjaBCQ
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.